Fallout from Obama’s defense of Hillary Clinton and much much more



Wasn’t it just three days ago the president vowed there would be no political influence in the investigation into Hillary Clinton and her email scandal? If the president weighing in again before the investigation is completed is not political influence then someone please tell me what the hell is? look I get it he wants this scandal over so he can get on with justifying Hillary’s actions  He will either give her an outright pass or he will allow Loretta Lynch to not pick up the indictment when and if the FBI requests Hillary be indicted. At this point Obama thinks we are stupid and we are going to believe the nice things he says about Hillary who by the way is not so nice. Either way Obama is running this show so we pretty much know that his mantra about nobody being above the law is crap. He treats his friends and secret holders far better than he treats the citizens of this nation. It is a sad thing to see Obama and how he administers justice, it really does not look like he places much value on morals or right and wrong. He needs to simply tell Hillary she is on her own but we know she knows other things that he does not want us to know.

Lawyers for the State Department have asked a federal judge to limit the scope of testimony about Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email account as secretary of state.

The government filed its response late Tuesday in a public records lawsuit filed by Judicial Watch, a conservative legal advocacy group. Federal District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan last month granted the group “limited discovery” into why the Democratic presidential front runner used an email server at her New York home while serving as the nation’s top diplomat.

Judicial Watch wants to question eight current and former department staffers under oath, including top Clinton aides Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin.

In its response, the government asked the judge to strictly limit the questions that can be asked to those involving the 2009 creation of Clinton’s private email system. Topics the government asked Sullivan to forbid include the “employment status of a single employee; the storage, handling, transmission, or protection of classified information, including cybersecurity issues; and questions about any pending investigations.”

The FBI is investigating whether sensitive information that flowed through Clinton’s email server was mishandled. The inspectors general at the State Department and for U.S. intelligence agencies are separately investigating whether rules or laws were broken.

There are also at least 38 civil lawsuits, including one filed by The Associated Press, seeking records related to Clinton’s time as secretary of state from 2009 to 2013.

Critics of Clinton’s decision to rely on the private server have suggested it potentially made her communications more vulnerable to being stolen by hackers, including those working for foreign intelligence agencies.

In response to public records requests, the State Department has released more than 52,000 pages of her work-related emails, a small percentage of which have been withheld because they contain information considered sensitive to national security.

Thousands of additional emails have been withheld by Clinton, whose lawyers say they contain personal messages unrelated to her government service.

Clinton has admitted on the campaign trail that her home-based email setup was a mistake, but insists she never sent or received any documents that were marked classified at the time. Whatever happened to the saying if you can’t do the time, don’t do the crime?


Signing off but never tapping out!

God Bless America!



Add yours →

  1. Reblogged this on Rifleman III Journal and commented:
    Hillary is being pulled out of the ocean. BHO will do it, because he believes that his legacy is strong. The rest of the world knows that his legacy will be ruined by the meddling if he does it further.

  2. What’s funny is to watch the pundits. A few weeks ago they were talking about Hillary may not get indicted, but would certainly get “referred for indictment”. Now, they’ve all changed their tune and said that there won’t even be a referral for indictment…even the Great One, Charles Krauthammer says that! What’s going on??? Guilty is still guilty in my book!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: